Clemens Kleine
28 Employer Review(s)
Colleagues:
Supervisor:
Tasks:
Salary:
Career:
OVERALL:
Location
#
Country
Date
Rating
Review
Berlin 1
14.09.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Sufficient cohesion. Need to improve personnel management. No filling operation. Demotivating income. Rickety ladder of success. Not recommendable employer.
Berlin 2
16.11.2017
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Not recommendable employer.
Berlin 3
18.02.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of community spirit. Employers with criticisms.
Berlin 4
22.03.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of unity. Problematic management style. Mere Work carried out. Employers with criticisms.
Berlin 5
09.05.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of community spirit. Problematic management style. No filling operation. Not recommendable employer.
Düsseldorf 6
22.04.2013
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Need to improve personnel management. Employers with criticisms.
Düsseldorf 7
25.03.2019
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Not recommendable employer.
Düsseldorf 8
07.04.2014
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Functioning collegiality. Need to improve personnel management. No filling operation. Demotivating income. Rickety ladder of success. Not recommendable employer.
Düsseldorf 9
02.11.2010
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Functioning collegiality. Need to improve personnel management. Filling employment. Lower wage level. Rare upgrades. Not recommendable employer.
Düsseldorf 10
12.04.2013
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of community spirit. Problematic management style. Not recommendable employer.
Düsseldorf 11
02.10.2014
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of community spirit. Need to improve personnel management. No filling operation. Rare upgrades. Employers with criticisms.
Düsseldorf 12
16.09.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of unity. Need to improve personnel management. No filling operation. Demotivating income. Rickety ladder of success. Reasonable job provider.
Erfurt 13
11.04.2012
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of unity. Need to improve personnel management. No filling operation. Demotivating income. Employers with criticisms.
Essen 14
29.11.2012
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Functioning collegiality. Excellent employer.
Essen 15
12.12.2012
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Lack of unity. Need to improve personnel management. No filling operation. Lower wage level. Rare upgrades. Not recommendable employer.
Essen 16
23.11.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Pleasant cooperation. Problematic management style. Acceptable service. Demotivating income. Rare upgrades. Not recommendable employer.
Essen 17
12.01.2011
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Functioning collegiality. Useful management. Filling employment. Fair payments. Average recognition. Employers with criticisms.
Filderstadt 18
14.06.2019
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Not recommendable employer.
Germany 19
24.11.2017
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 20
17.12.2018
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 21
12.03.2019
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 22
26.12.2016
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Not recommendable employer.
Germany 23
03.08.2016
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 24
31.01.2016
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 25
20.12.2015
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Germany 26
15.12.2014
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Not recommendable employer.
Germany 27
15.03.2016
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Excellent employer.
Stuttgart 28
13.03.2016
The Reviewer rates his job as follows: Not recommendable employer.
